Capabilities for Adaptation, Risk Management
and Decision-Making in Asset-Intensive Industries
FEATURED PAPER
By David Tain, MSc., P.Eng., PMP
Institute of Commissioning & Assurance
Septentrion Strategic Solutions, LTD
Alberta, Canada
- Introduction
The transition of projects to live operations is one of the most critical phases in the lifecycle of an asset. Large capital projects, whether in energy, infrastructure, transportation, mining, manufacturing, data centers, etc. are typically managed through project management methodologies focused on delivering within cost, schedule, and scope – known as the “iron triangle”. However, even organizations that successfully at delivering against these metrics face significant challenges when transitioning completed projects and try to materialize value through efficient start ups & safe, sustainable and reliable operations.
The gap between project completion and operational performance brings important challenges, recurrently evidenced in multiple transitional and operational variables that include delayed start-ups, erratic production ramp-ups, safety incidents, and costly post-startup interventions among others. The emergence if these variables indicate that technical completeness does not necessarily equate to preparedness to operate new assets. Instead, transitions of live assets to operations are strongly dependent on the orchestration of a larger socio-technical system that includes organizational capabilities, people readiness, procedures, governance, decision-making frameworks, and system integration.
One of the most significant sources of these challenges lays on divergences in the strategic orientation between project management and operations. On the one hand, traditional project management approaches tend to treat the end of construction or commissioning as the conclusion of the project lifecycle. On the other hand, from an operational standpoint, the most critical phase often begins precisely at that moment: bringing an asset to life represents a period characterized by uncertainty, evolving system conditions, and the need for rapid decision-making with incomplete information. At the most fundamental level, technical assets, humans and organizational processes interact in ways that are frequently non-linear and difficult to predict.
With the advancement of technology, digital solutions have progressively emerged in the market to support commissioning management, asset performance monitoring, predictive maintenance, project controls, and operational analytics among others. However, in multiple cases, evidence shows that the adoption of these solutions occurs without a diligent alignment with the organizational architectures and processes. This has created a new set of challenges as organizations are attempting to address capability-based challenges through technology. In reality, workflow and data can be automated, yet these cannot replace the organizational capabilities required to manage the complexities in transitioning projects to operations.
Bringing a project to life is surrounded by critical parameters that include uncertainty, incomplete information, and evolving system conditions. This indicates the pivotal role risk management plays during the transition of projects to operations. Ensuring readiness to operate requires a systematic identification, evaluation, and mitigation of multiple risks associated not only with the technical characteristics of the asset, but also with human factors, systems, integration, technology, operational processes and the organization. Risk management is therefore the most critical activity during transition as it is the central mechanism through which organizations anticipate emerging challenges and maintain control over complex operational systems.
More…
To read entire paper, click here
How to cite this paper: Tain, D. (2026). Operational Readiness and Outcome Assurance: Capabilities for Adaptation, Risk Management and Decision-Making in Asset-Intensive Industries; PM World Journal, Vol. XV, Issue IV, April. Available online at https://pmworldjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/pmwj163-Apr2026-Tain-Operational-Readiness-and-Outcome-Assurance.pdf
About the Author
David Tain
Alberta, Canada
David Tain is the Chairman of the Technical Committee of the Institute for Commissioning and Assurance (ICxA) and Vice president of the Institute for Latin America and the Mediterranean Region. He is also the Director of Septentrion Strategic Solutions LTD, a global Strategic management firm specialized in Operational Readiness and Project Execution (www.septentrionglobal.com)
With over 25 years of on-shore and off-shore experience in Canada, South America and Europe, David has extensive expertise in developing and implementing Operational Readiness programs and in delivering projects in all phases, working alongside multinational energy organizations including Shell, Total E&P, ConocoPhillips, Suncor, AMEC, Statoil and PDVSA
David is a Civil Engineer from Santa Maria University in Venezuela, a MSc. in Management from University of Liverpool, UK and completed the Strategic Decision and Risk Management Professional Program at Stanford University, USA. He is also a Project Management Professional (PMP) from the Project Management Institute and holds the Professional Engineer (P.Eng.) designation from the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists (APEGA) in Canada.
David Tain can be contacted at taindavid@yahoo.com
