Integrating PDRI and BSC
PEER REVIEWED PAPER
By Geoffrey Dawson
Perth, Australia
Abstract
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) programs and projects frequently underperform due to weaknesses in front-end definition, requirements discipline, and benefit ownership. Audit and Industry evidence repeatedly linked these early-stage governance gaps to downstream cost overruns, schedule delays, and unrealised benefits (Government Accountability Office, 2000, 2004; Musawir et al., 2017; Project Management Institute, 2025). In response, this paper develops an integrated pre‑planning governance framework that combines (i) a Project Definition Readiness Index (PDRI) – an evidence-anchored, weighted readiness assessment tailored to ICT risk structures—and (ii) an ICT-adapted Balanced Scorecard (BSC) – a multi-perspective measurement system used to translate strategy into measurable objectives with accountable owners. Drawing on established definition-index logic (e.g., PDRI‑type instruments and public‑sector readiness adaptations) and Balanced Scorecard theory, the framework operationalises two linked governance tests at each decision gate: “Are we ready to deliver?” (definition readiness and feasibility) and “Is this worth delivering?” (strategic alignment and measurable value). The paper specifies the integrated operating model, evidence requirements, threshold and blocker rules, and a Value × Readiness portfolio lens to improve sequencing and reduce “execution bias.” An evaluation approach is proposed using multi‑archetype pilots and longitudinal tracking to calibrate scoring weights, thresholds, and Key Performance Indicator (KPI) feasibility over time. The contribution is a decision-grade, implementable governance system for the Project Management Office (PMO) to strengthen early risk visibility, improve investment decision quality, and enhance accountability for benefits realisation
Highlights
-
- Integrates definition readiness and outcome governance for ICT projects
- Proposes a decision-grade PDRI–BSC pre-planning framework
- Reduces execution bias through readiness and value-based gate decisions
- Strengthens portfolio prioritisation using value × readiness logic
- Discusses implications for governance of AI-enabled ICT initiatives
Keywords: ICT program management; front-end planning; readiness assessment; Balanced Scorecard; stage-gate governance; portfolio management.
More…
To read entire paper, click here
How to cite this paper: Dawson, G. (2026). Improving Front-End ICT Portfolio Governance: Integrating PDRI and BSC; PM World Journal, Vol. XV, Issue IV, April. Available online at https://pmworldjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/pmwj163-Apr2026-Dawson-Improving-Front-End-ICT-portfolio-governance.pdf
About the Author
Geoffrey Dawson
Perth, Australia
Geoffrey Dawson is a senior PMO, program and project management professional with over 20 years’ experience across government, energy, mining, education and not-for-profit sectors. He combines MBA-level business leadership, deep ICT delivery expertise, and postgraduate teaching experience, specialising in PMO maturity, enterprise systems, governance and AI-enabled project delivery. He can be contacted at geoffrey.dawson@iinet.net.au
