ChatGPT and Risk
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
By Federico Minelle and Franco Stolfi
Rome, Italy
Ref: Ref.: Hopkinson, M. (2023). On the Subject of AI, ChatGPT and Risk, Letter to the Editor, PM World Journal, Vol. XII, Issue VI, June
12 June 2023
Dear David,
We fully agree with the referenced letter and would like to add some points about the subject paper, published in the May ’23 issue. We hope they would give additional evidence to Hopkinson’s findings.
Risk focus
For the sake of conciseness, we avoid listing all the Questions/Answers submitted to the ChatGPT tool, which are in any case included in the quality assessment process.
Among them we now highlight the most relevant ones to the risk issue.
- At the start of the project (Phase 1):
The above Q/A was not listed in previous paper.
- In process: 1 month after the start of the project (Phase 2):
All the above Q/A were listed in previous paper.
- Nearly to completion: 1 week before the estimated end of the project (Phase 3)
More…
To read entire Letter to the Editor, click here
How to cite this work: Minelle, F., Stolfi, F. (2023). Comments on June letter about AI, ChatGPT and Risk; letter-to-the-editor, PM World Journal, Vol. XII, Issue VII, July. Available online at https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/pmwj131-Jul2023-Minelle-Stolfi-on-Hopkinson-Letter-about-ChatGPT-quality-assessment-letter-to-editor-2.pdf
